{"id":82,"date":"2019-09-01T23:10:57","date_gmt":"2019-09-01T23:10:57","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/600hemphill.com\/?page_id=82"},"modified":"2020-05-03T19:29:06","modified_gmt":"2020-05-03T19:29:06","slug":"key-cases","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/600hemphill.com\/index.php\/key-cases\/","title":{"rendered":"Key Texas Supreme Court Cases"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<div class=\"wp-block-themeisle-blocks-advanced-columns has-1-columns has-desktop-equal-layout has-tablet-equal-layout has-mobile-equal-layout has-default-gap has-vertical-unset\" id=\"wp-block-themeisle-blocks-advanced-columns-97b5fb1b\"><div class=\"wp-block-themeisle-blocks-advanced-columns-overlay\"><\/div><div class=\"innerblocks-wrap\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-themeisle-blocks-advanced-column\" id=\"wp-block-themeisle-blocks-advanced-column-1869325f\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">&#8220;Required reading&#8221; from the Texas Supreme Court includes its opinions on basic procedural issues as well as key commercial-law concepts. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><em>Procedure: The standard for evaluating sufficiency of evidence<\/em><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\"><figure class=\"alignleft size-large is-resized\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/600hemphill.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/microscope-review.jpg?resize=197%2C134&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-335\" width=\"197\" height=\"134\"\/><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/scholar.google.com\/scholar_case?case=18303564960181757665&amp;q=city+keller+wilson&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=4,44\">City of Keller v. Wilson<\/a>, 168 S.W.3d 802 (Tex. 2005) (&#8220;&#8216;No evidence&#8217; points must, and may only, be sustained when the record  discloses one of the following situations: (a) a complete absence of  evidence of a vital fact; (b) the court is barred by rules of law or of  evidence from giving weight to the only evidence offered to prove a  vital fact; (c) the evidence offered to prove a vital fact is no more  than a mere scintilla; (d) the evidence establishes conclusively the  opposite of the vital fact.&#8221;).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><em>Procedure: The standard for mandamus relief<\/em> <\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/scholar.google.com\/scholar_case?case=6207522956368226204&amp;q=prudential+mandamus&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=4,44\">In re: Prudential Ins. Co. of Am.<\/a>, 148 S.W.3d 124 (Tex. 2004) (&#8220;Prudential must meet two requirements. One is to show that the trial court clearly abused its discretion. . . . . The other requirement Prudential must meet is to show that it has no adequate remedy by appeal. . . . The operative word, &#8216;adequate,&#8217; has no comprehensive definition; it is simply a proxy for the careful balance of jurisprudential considerations that determine when appellate courts will use original mandamus proceedings to review the actions of lower courts. These considerations implicate both public and private interests.&#8221;).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><em>Procedure: Potential error in a broad-form submission<\/em><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"http:\/\/Crown Life Ins. Co. v. Casteel\">Crown Life Ins. Co. v. Casteel<\/a>, 22 S.W.3d 378 (Tex. 2000) (&#8220;[W]hen a jury bases a finding of liability on a single broad-form question that commingles invalid theories of liability with valid theories, the appellate court is often unable to determine the effect of this error. The best the court can do is determine that some evidence<em> could <\/em>have supported the jury&#8217;s conclusion on a legally valid theory. To hold this error harmless would allow a defendant to be held liable without a judicial determination that a factfinder actually found that the defendant should be held liable on proper, legal grounds.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><em>Substance: The role of &#8220;red flags&#8221; in evaluating justifiable reliance<\/em><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\"><figure class=\"alignright size-large is-resized\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/600hemphill.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/red-flag-auto-race.gif?resize=297%2C168&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-333\" width=\"297\" height=\"168\"\/><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/scholar.google.com\/scholar_case?case=9763205046959591368&amp;q=orca+red+flags&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=4,44\">JPMorgan Chase Bank v. Orca Assets GP<\/a>, 546 S.W.3d 648 (Tex. 2018) (&#8220;Viewed in context with the numerous &#8216;red flags,&#8217; Orca&#8217;s sophistication  in the oil-and-gas industry, and the direct contradiction between the  representation and the letter of intent,<sup><a href=\"https:\/\/scholar.google.com\/scholar_case?case=9763205046959591368&amp;q=orca+red+flags&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=4,44#[2]\"> <\/a><\/sup>Orca cannot maintain its claim of justifiable reliance.&#8221;); <em>cf.<\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/600hemphill.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/Credit-Suisse-AG-v.-Claymore-Holdings-LLC-SCOTX.pdf\">Credit Suisse AG v. Claymore Holdings LLC<\/a>, No. 18-0403 (Tex. April 24, 2020) (&#8220;The fact that certain irregularities might have been gleaned from a close examination of the 200-page Appraisal and its supporting documentation does not eviscerate the jury\u2019s finding that Credit Suisse had superior knowledge of the material facts. . . . [G]iven the jury finding of its superior knowledge, Credit Suisse cannot rely on the contractual disclaimers to defeat liability for fraudulent inducement.&#8221; No. 18-0403 (April 24, 2020) (citation omitted).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><em>Substance: Sanctity of contract <\/em><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\"><figure class=\"alignleft size-large is-resized\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/600hemphill.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/sir-george-jessell.jpg?resize=193%2C314&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-336\" width=\"193\" height=\"314\"\/><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/scholar.google.com\/scholar_case?case=10438216847953253984&amp;q=energy+transfer+partners+enterprise+2020&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=4,44\">Energy Transfer Partners LP v. Enterprise Products Partners LP<\/a>, 593 S.W.3d 732 (Tex. 2020) (quoting Sir George Jessel as saying: &#8220;[I]f there is one thing which more than another public policy requires it is that men of full age and competent understanding shall have the utmost liberty of contracting, and that their contracts when entered into freely and voluntarily shall be held sacred and shall be enforced by Courts of justice. Therefore, you have this paramount public policy to consider\u2014that you are not lightly to interfere with this freedom of contract.&#8221;). <\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">, <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>,<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"sfsi_plus_gutenberg_text_before_share":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_show_text_before_share":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_icon_type":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_icon_alignemt":"","sfsi_plus_gutenburg_max_per_row":"","_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-82","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v28.7 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Key Texas Supreme Court Commercial Litigation Cases - 600 Hemphill<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"David Coale of Lynn Pinker Hurst lists key Texas Supreme Court cases regarding commercial litigation that have set impactful precedent.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/600hemphill.com\/index.php\/key-cases\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Key Texas Supreme Court Commercial Litigation Cases - 600 Hemphill\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"David Coale of Lynn Pinker Hurst lists key Texas Supreme Court cases regarding commercial litigation that have set impactful precedent.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/600hemphill.com\/index.php\/key-cases\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"600 Hemphill\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-05-03T19:29:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/600hemphill.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/microscope-review.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/600hemphill.com\\\/index.php\\\/key-cases\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/600hemphill.com\\\/index.php\\\/key-cases\\\/\",\"name\":\"Key Texas Supreme Court Commercial Litigation Cases - 600 Hemphill\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/600hemphill.com\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/600hemphill.com\\\/index.php\\\/key-cases\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/600hemphill.com\\\/index.php\\\/key-cases\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/600hemphill.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/05\\\/microscope-review.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-09-01T23:10:57+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-05-03T19:29:06+00:00\",\"description\":\"David Coale of Lynn Pinker Hurst lists key Texas Supreme Court cases regarding commercial litigation that have set impactful precedent.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/600hemphill.com\\\/index.php\\\/key-cases\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/600hemphill.com\\\/index.php\\\/key-cases\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/600hemphill.com\\\/index.php\\\/key-cases\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i0.wp.com\\\/600hemphill.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/05\\\/microscope-review.jpg?fit=500%2C334&ssl=1\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i0.wp.com\\\/600hemphill.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/05\\\/microscope-review.jpg?fit=500%2C334&ssl=1\",\"width\":500,\"height\":334},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/600hemphill.com\\\/index.php\\\/key-cases\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/600hemphill.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Key Texas Supreme Court Cases\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/600hemphill.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/600hemphill.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"600 Hemphill\",\"description\":\"Commercial Litigation in the Texas Supreme Court\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/600hemphill.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Key Texas Supreme Court Commercial Litigation Cases - 600 Hemphill","description":"David Coale of Lynn Pinker Hurst lists key Texas Supreme Court cases regarding commercial litigation that have set impactful precedent.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/600hemphill.com\/index.php\/key-cases\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Key Texas Supreme Court Commercial Litigation Cases - 600 Hemphill","og_description":"David Coale of Lynn Pinker Hurst lists key Texas Supreme Court cases regarding commercial litigation that have set impactful precedent.","og_url":"https:\/\/600hemphill.com\/index.php\/key-cases\/","og_site_name":"600 Hemphill","article_modified_time":"2020-05-03T19:29:06+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"https:\/\/600hemphill.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/microscope-review.jpg","type":"","width":"","height":""}],"twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/600hemphill.com\/index.php\/key-cases\/","url":"https:\/\/600hemphill.com\/index.php\/key-cases\/","name":"Key Texas Supreme Court Commercial Litigation Cases - 600 Hemphill","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/600hemphill.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/600hemphill.com\/index.php\/key-cases\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/600hemphill.com\/index.php\/key-cases\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/600hemphill.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/microscope-review.jpg","datePublished":"2019-09-01T23:10:57+00:00","dateModified":"2020-05-03T19:29:06+00:00","description":"David Coale of Lynn Pinker Hurst lists key Texas Supreme Court cases regarding commercial litigation that have set impactful precedent.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/600hemphill.com\/index.php\/key-cases\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/600hemphill.com\/index.php\/key-cases\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/600hemphill.com\/index.php\/key-cases\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/600hemphill.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/microscope-review.jpg?fit=500%2C334&ssl=1","contentUrl":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/600hemphill.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/microscope-review.jpg?fit=500%2C334&ssl=1","width":500,"height":334},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/600hemphill.com\/index.php\/key-cases\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/600hemphill.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Key Texas Supreme Court Cases"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/600hemphill.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/600hemphill.com\/","name":"600 Hemphill","description":"Commercial Litigation in the Texas Supreme Court","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/600hemphill.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"}]}},"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/600hemphill.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/82","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/600hemphill.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/600hemphill.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/600hemphill.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/600hemphill.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=82"}],"version-history":[{"count":13,"href":"https:\/\/600hemphill.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/82\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":337,"href":"https:\/\/600hemphill.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/82\/revisions\/337"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/600hemphill.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=82"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}